<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Daily Plastic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyplastic.com/comments/feed/?withcomments=1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on TIFF &#039;08, Day 5 by sandpit11</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2008/09/tiff-08-day-5/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>sandpit11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=968#comment-520</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen any of McQueen&#039;s work, but Hunger looks appealing to me. I wasn&#039;t aware of the man&#039;s work until I saw an ad for Fangoria&#039;s FrightFest on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't seen any of McQueen's work, but Hunger looks appealing to me. I wasn't aware of the man's work until I saw an ad for Fangoria's FrightFest on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Miracle at St. Anna by Joseph Rae</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2008/09/miracle-at-st-anna/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=1277#comment-504</guid>
		<description>This is what I&#039;ve been able to learn about the song &quot;He&#039;s got the whole world in his hand.&quot; My understanding is it is not in the soundtrack. This song is sung by the Morehead College Glee Club, Spike Lee&#039;s alma mater. The glee club has there own website, which sell its own albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I've been able to learn about the song "He's got the whole world in his hand." My understanding is it is not in the soundtrack. This song is sung by the Morehead College Glee Club, Spike Lee's alma mater. The glee club has there own website, which sell its own albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Nominees, Part Two by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2010/03/oscar-nominees-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2617#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Nice to hear you guys again.  I was pleased that you felt as I did about &quot;Avatar&quot;--that despite the hype, the 3D almost seemed superfluous (can&#039;t believe it qualified much less won for Best Cinematography)--and I&#039;ll definitely keep my eye out for &quot;Pontypool&quot; and &quot;Two Lovers,&quot; which I keep making a mental note to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear you guys again.  I was pleased that you felt as I did about "Avatar" &mdash; that despite the hype, the 3D almost seemed superfluous (can't believe it qualified much less won for Best Cinematography) &mdash; and I'll definitely keep my eye out for "Pontypool" and "Two Lovers," which I keep making a mental note to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Nominees, Part One by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2010/02/oscar-nominees-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2607#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Welcome back, guys!  Great show, perfectly spot-on on several of the nominees, most notably &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Hurt Locker&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Up In The Air&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, whose failings amidst its appeal you really nailed.  Why do so many people- especially certain pro critics- love the latter film &lt;i&gt;so much&lt;/i&gt;? My theory is that it&#039;s this season&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Sideways&lt;/i&gt;: it asks its audience to identify with a central character that for various reasons is particularly easy for the type of person who has chosen criticism as a career to identify with.  I was going to parallel the various ways Clooney resembles a working film critic, but it started sounding like a bitter screed so I&#039;m holding off; I don&#039;t mean it that way at all. But I do think when Reitman found this character he knew what he had, and his studio was able to position his film as a successful Oscar picture in no small part because of this critic-pleasing aspect of the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back, guys!  Great show, perfectly spot-on on several of the nominees, most notably <i><b>The Hurt Locker</b></i> and <b><i>Up In The Air</i></b>, whose failings amidst its appeal you really nailed.  Why do so many people- especially certain pro critics- love the latter film <i>so much</i>? My theory is that it's this season's <i>Sideways</i>: it asks its audience to identify with a central character that for various reasons is particularly easy for the type of person who has chosen criticism as a career to identify with.  I was going to parallel the various ways Clooney resembles a working film critic, but it started sounding like a bitter screed so I'm holding off; I don't mean it that way at all. But I do think when Reitman found this character he knew what he had, and his studio was able to position his film as a successful Oscar picture in no small part because of this critic-pleasing aspect of the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Coen Brothers and Chantal&#160;Akerman by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2009/11/the-coen-brothers-and-chantal-akerman/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2594#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Lovely listen, guys.

Is it me, or are the Coen Brothers more present than usual in this film? It&#039;s not uncommon watching one of their films for me to notice, &quot;oh that line of dialogue sounds like something written by a screenwriter&quot; or &quot;hey that camera composition looks like a carefully storyboarded shot&quot;.  But this time around I felt like that was happening with practically every single line and every composition!

It somehow seems appropriate, however, for a film that explicitly is &quot;about&quot; the fate of human existence in a (seemingly) pre-ordained universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely listen, guys.</p>
<p>Is it me, or are the Coen Brothers more present than usual in this film? It's not uncommon watching one of their films for me to notice, "oh that line of dialogue sounds like something written by a screenwriter" or "hey that camera composition looks like a carefully storyboarded shot".  But this time around I felt like that was happening with practically every single line and every composition!</p>
<p>It somehow seems appropriate, however, for a film that explicitly is "about" the fate of human existence in a (seemingly) pre-ordained universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Coen Brothers and Chantal&#160;Akerman by Robert DAVIS</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2009/11/the-coen-brothers-and-chantal-akerman/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert DAVIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2594#comment-428</guid>
		<description>J. Robert, the UP may just be written on the blackboard as part of the same lecture. I&#039;m not sure we hear him say anything about it. As for the cat, later Larry says, &quot;Even I don&#039;t understand the cat.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Robert, the UP may just be written on the blackboard as part of the same lecture. I'm not sure we hear him say anything about it. As for the cat, later Larry says, "Even I don't understand the cat."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Coen Brothers and Chantal&#160;Akerman by J Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2009/11/the-coen-brothers-and-chantal-akerman/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>J Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2594#comment-427</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand quantum physics enough to dive into this question, but our first sight of Larry in the classroom is him discussing Schrodinger&#039;s Cat. How does that fit with the Uncertainty Principle? And when in the movie does Heisenberg get invoked (I just don&#039;t remember that scene well enough)?

Physics majors report?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't understand quantum physics enough to dive into this question, but our first sight of Larry in the classroom is him discussing Schrodinger's Cat. How does that fit with the Uncertainty Principle? And when in the movie does Heisenberg get invoked (I just don't remember that scene well enough)?</p>
<p>Physics majors report?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Coen Brothers and Chantal&#160;Akerman by HarryTuttle</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2009/11/the-coen-brothers-and-chantal-akerman/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>HarryTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2594#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Welcome back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Coen Brothers and Chantal&#160;Akerman by davis</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2009/11/the-coen-brothers-and-chantal-akerman/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2594#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Andy. I&#039;ve missed the podcast.

J. Robert, I also wish we&#039;d have mentioned the movie&#039;s most inspired metaphor: the Columbia House Record Club. Do nothing and a new record will be sent to you. You must act to prevent a purchase. Insert this into our remarks about Man&#039;s default state of guilt.

A footnote about the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle mentioned in the Coen movie: From my memory of basic physics classes, which I attended an alarming 15 years ago, the principle says not that you can&#039;t know anything but that you can&#039;t know everything. That is, you can&#039;t know both the location and the velocity of a particle, because the act of measuring it -- which would likely involve slamming it with a particle of known location and velocity -- will change one or both of those values.  (Memory is hazy. I can&#039;t be bothered to Google this at the moment.)

I mention this because I was going to say that the Coens probably don&#039;t know or care about the details of the physics their character teaches -- liberal arts majors, I bet, or just too tired, like me -- &lt;i&gt;until&lt;/i&gt; I realized how nicely the principle fits with the dialogue in the second rabbi&#039;s office: &quot;Well, you can&#039;t know everything.&quot; &quot;It seems like you don&#039;t know anything!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Andy. I've missed the podcast.</p>
<p>J. Robert, I also wish we'd have mentioned the movie's most inspired metaphor: the Columbia House Record Club. Do nothing and a new record will be sent to you. You must act to prevent a purchase. Insert this into our remarks about Man's default state of guilt.</p>
<p>A footnote about the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle mentioned in the Coen movie: From my memory of basic physics classes, which I attended an alarming 15 years ago, the principle says not that you can't know anything but that you can't know everything. That is, you can't know both the location and the velocity of a particle, because the act of measuring it  &mdash;  which would likely involve slamming it with a particle of known location and velocity  &mdash;  will change one or both of those values.  (Memory is hazy. I can't be bothered to Google this at the moment.)</p>
<p>I mention this because I was going to say that the Coens probably don't know or care about the details of the physics their character teaches  &mdash;  liberal arts majors, I bet, or just too tired, like me  &mdash;  <i>until</i> I realized how nicely the principle fits with the dialogue in the second rabbi's office: "Well, you can't know everything." "It seems like you don't know anything!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Coen Brothers and Chantal&#160;Akerman by Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyplastic.com/2009/11/the-coen-brothers-and-chantal-akerman/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyplastic.com/?p=2594#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Good morning &lt;em&gt;Daily Plastic&lt;/em&gt;! It is nice to see you again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning <em>Daily Plastic</em>! It is nice to see you again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.222 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
